<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama, the Democrats and the War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/08/22/obama-the-democrats-and-the-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/08/22/obama-the-democrats-and-the-war/</link>
	<description>Benjamin Franklin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HopeisNotAForeignPolicy</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/08/22/obama-the-democrats-and-the-war/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>HopeisNotAForeignPolicy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=120#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I concur.  Rauch raises some very important questions here.  Sen. Obama and the Democratic Party simply do not believe that the United States is at war.  Statements from Sens. Reid and Obama--and Speaker Pelosi--have made this painfully clear.  Still, the threat of radical terrorism persists.  However, any day spent discussing the national security of the United States is not usually a good one for Sen. Obama.  That is why the Obama campaign and its supporters in the mainstream media have chosen to marginalize this very important issue.  The United States needs a commander-in-chief who sees the world as it is, not how he wishes it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur.  Rauch raises some very important questions here.  Sen. Obama and the Democratic Party simply do not believe that the United States is at war.  Statements from Sens. Reid and Obama&#8211;and Speaker Pelosi&#8211;have made this painfully clear.  Still, the threat of radical terrorism persists.  However, any day spent discussing the national security of the United States is not usually a good one for Sen. Obama.  That is why the Obama campaign and its supporters in the mainstream media have chosen to marginalize this very important issue.  The United States needs a commander-in-chief who sees the world as it is, not how he wishes it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

