<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Liberty Dwells, there is my country &#187; President Messiah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/category/president-messiah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com</link>
	<description>Benjamin Franklin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Media&#8217;s Obamalove Confirmed Once Again</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/05/12/medias-obamalove-confirmed-once-again/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/05/12/medias-obamalove-confirmed-once-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Messiah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamalove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Datum point after datum point. The American media&#8217;s obamalove needs to be documented, and it is, thanks to the good folks at Media Research Center and Newsbusters.org. Some of the key findings: Obama’s first 100 days were defined by massive spending, aggressive intervention in the private sector and proposals for a huge expansion of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Datum point after datum point.  The American media&#8217;s obamalove needs to be documented, and it is, thanks to the good folks at Media Research Center and <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2009/05/11/mrc-study-tv-networks-cheer-barack-obamas-revolution">Newsbusters.org</a>.</p>
<p>Some of the key findings:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama’s first 100 days were defined by massive spending, aggressive intervention in the private sector and proposals for a huge expansion of the federal government. Yet none of the networks aired a single story on whether Obama’s policies were pushing the U.S. toward socialism, and no reporter used the term “socialist” to describe Obama.</p>
<p>Not only that, network reporters never used the word “liberal” to describe either Barack Obama or his agenda during the first 100 days.</p>
<p>The networks lavished good press on every major initiative of the early Obama administration, including the massive stimulus package, all of the various bailouts, health care, stem cells, the environment and foreign policy.</p>
<p>In the days before the President unveiled his unprecedented $3.5 trillion budget — with a record-shattering $1.75 trillion deficit — four out of five statements on the evening newscasts parroted the White House spin that Obama was a deficit fighter.</p>
<p>Reporters treated Obama’s hugely expensive $787 billion stimulus bill to mainly positive coverage (58 percent positive, 42 percent negative).</p>
<p>The networks applauded Obama’s decision to use taxpayer money to fund embryo-destroying stem cell research (82% positive coverage).</p>
<p>Network coverage of Obama’s mortgage bailout was also positive — 59% of statements supported the bailout or wanted even more intervention, compared to 41% who opposed the bailout as unfair to responsible homeowners.</p>
<p>Reporters heavily skewed their coverage in favor of the President’s actions on global warming (78% positive).</p>
<p>President Obama’s decision to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan was greeted by nearly unanimous (91%) positive coverage — a far cry from the highly negative coverage of President Bush’s successful troop surge in Iraq two years ago.</p>
<p>Like Obama and the Democrats, the networks went on a feeding frenzy against big corporate bonuses. The networks aired six times more statements forwarding the “infuriated” reaction to business (104) than criticized politicians’ grandstanding (16).</p>
<p>The networks spent days decrying AIG’s $165 million bonuses, but hardly mentioned the $210 million in bonuses handed out by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the bailed-out mortgage giants with strong Democratic ties). ABC and NBC completely ignored the Fannie and Freddie bonuses, while the CBS Evening News gave it 27 seconds.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is how propaganda works, right here in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/05/12/medias-obamalove-confirmed-once-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Bows Before Saudi King</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/04/09/obama-bows-before-saudi-king/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/04/09/obama-bows-before-saudi-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Messiah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama bows before Saudi King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is unthinkable that an American President would bow before a Saudi King. Obama did not bow to Queen Elizabeth, yet he did before Saudi King Abdullah. Curious. Obama&#8217;s action at the G-20 Summit is simply unbelievable:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is unthinkable that an American President would bow before a Saudi King.  Obama did not bow to Queen Elizabeth, yet he did before Saudi King Abdullah.  Curious.<br />
Obama&#8217;s action at the G-20 Summit is simply unbelievable:</p>
<p><object width="400" height="337"><param name="movie" value="http://images.salon.com/video.swf?id=w-77358-2015391"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://images.salon.com/video.swf?id=w-77358-2015391" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="337" allowScriptAccess="always"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/04/09/obama-bows-before-saudi-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President-Elect Messiah Only Takes Easy Questions</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/12/17/president-elect-messiah-only-takes-easy-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/12/17/president-elect-messiah-only-takes-easy-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Messiah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, President-Elect Messiah refused to answer a question on Rahm Emanuel&#8217;s relationship with corrupt Illinois Governor Blago.  The question came from Chicago Tribune reporter John McCormick.  President-Elect Messiah told McCormick not to waste his question on that issue.  Why can&#8217;t McCormick be like the reporters at The Washington Post or New York Times or CNN, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, President-Elect Messiah refused to answer a question on Rahm Emanuel&#8217;s relationship with corrupt Illinois Governor Blago.  The question came from Chicago <em>Tribune</em> reporter John McCormick.  President-Elect Messiah told McCormick not to waste his question on<em> that</em> issue.  Why can&#8217;t McCormick be like the reporters at <em>The Washington Post</em> or <em>New York Times</em> or CNN, ABC, CBS, or NBC, who would never ask Messiah such a question.  They would prefer to ask him what is his favorite color, or how much he loves his daughters.</p>
<p>One would think that the Old Media would be ashamed at their behavior toward Messiah, but you be wrong.  More and more people recognize that the bulk of Old Media are an arm of the Democratic Party.  They will cover for Messiah, not challenge him.  So much for speaking Truth to power.  Or protecting the American People&#8230;.or the American political process.</p>
<p>Goodbye to all that.</p>
<p>Tim Graham from newsbusters.org has more on the story <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/12/17/obama-lectures-reporter-dont-waste-your-question-blago" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/12/17/president-elect-messiah-only-takes-easy-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

