<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Liberty Dwells, there is my country &#187; Democratic Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/tag/democratic-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com</link>
	<description>Benjamin Franklin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It Has Been a Summer of Discontent&#8230;As Americans Realize What They Are Losing</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2010/08/08/it-has-been-a-summer-of-discontent-as-americans-realize-what-they-are-losing/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2010/08/08/it-has-been-a-summer-of-discontent-as-americans-realize-what-they-are-losing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama and socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism and the Democratic Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are losing their country and have been for a generation. A short review of where are we now in the United States of America&#8230; ever increasing amounts of debt; a President who clearly does not want to be President, one who is poison to his fellow party-members, and one who has left no golf [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are losing their country and have been for a generation.</p>
<p>A short review of where are we now in the United States of America&#8230;<br />
ever increasing amounts of debt;<br />
a President who clearly does not want to be President, one who is poison to his fellow party-members, and one who has left no golf course behind;<br />
disaster in the Gulf<br />
a mosque that simply must be built almost on top of the 9/11 site in NYC, with support from NYC officials, in what is a disgusting act;<br />
palpable anger in the country about the direction the Democrats have taken the country;<br />
lawlessness on the border, with the Democrats attacking Arizona for attempting the solve the problem the federal government created;<br />
federal judges overturning the will of the voters, fine for the judges to do so, they are aiming for higher courts if the Democrats stay in office, but the people need to remember their actions every November;<br />
a media so invested in Obama, and so supportive of him that one wonders why anyone would watch or read them unless to get a sense of the role of the media in North Korea</p>
<p>But there is something more going on:<br />
One of Orwell&#8217;s great lines in <em>1984</em> was that &#8220;the chocolate ration has been increased from 30 grams to 25 grams&#8230;&#8221; Their are some truths so profound the Democratic Media Complex can&#8217;t hide them.  One of these truths is that Americans are beginning to recognize the influence of the radical Left on the Democrats, and want none of it any more.  Time for all Americans to recognize that radicals have control of the Democratic Party and will continue to march that Party, and the country when they can, toward socialism.</p>
<p>Past time to fire these guys&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2010/08/08/it-has-been-a-summer-of-discontent-as-americans-realize-what-they-are-losing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life in America as a One Party State</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/03/03/life-in-america-as-a-one-party-state/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/03/03/life-in-america-as-a-one-party-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism in America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America as a one party state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama and the Congressional Democrats are not wasting time.  The drive to turn the United States into a socialist country is happening right here, right now.  Overwhelmingly, the Old Media are in accord with this, so there will not be any opposition from those, heretofore, had acted to preserve liberties.  The elite Republicans are in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama and the Congressional Democrats are not wasting time.  The<br />
drive to turn the United States into a socialist country is happening<br />
right here, right now.  Overwhelmingly, the Old Media are in accord<br />
with this, so there will not be any opposition from those, heretofore,<br />
had acted to preserve liberties.  The elite Republicans are in lock<br />
step, only two behind.</p>
<p>You could see this day coming.  The communists and socialist<br />
movements had been laboring hard to take over the Democratic Party,<br />
educational institutions (from K-graduate school), popular culture and<br />
the media.  Their work is paying off now.  They have elected a<br />
socialist in the guise of a Democrat.  Their hand is on the pilot wheel<br />
of state, and it is hard over Left.</p>
<p>While the Left won, the Republicans decided to resist their<br />
efforts by supporting the measures favored by Democrats rather than<br />
returning to their principles.  So the Republicans have become the<br />
Party of Big Government, but less Big than the socialists want.</p>
<p>What are those Americans who love liberty and its political<br />
principles to do?    The answer is singular in intent but multifaceted<br />
in scope:  Struggle against socialism by learning from the Left and<br />
acting against it&#8211;while there is still time.  IfObama&#8217;s policies are<br />
not reversed, the country will become socialist.  Americans must<br />
connect again with their political principles.  This means being<br />
educated about them.</p>
<p>The Left cut out many of America&#8217;s principles from the educational</p>
<p>system in their effort to place American on the path to socialism.</p>
<p>Individual rights and liberties conflict with the Left&#8217;s desire to crush the</p>
<p>individual in favor of group identity.</p>
<p>All Americans can work to require American political principles are taught<br />
again in schools and universities.  Americans can create and support<br />
popular culture that supports America.  When Oprah or other Leftists<br />
appear on television (which is almost always) turn the channel or turn<br />
off the TV.</p>
<p>Recognize that popular culture is a tool of the Left,<br />
and so no longer support it.  If Americans are strong enough to do<br />
this, popular culture will have to change or go extinct.  Leftist<br />
newspapers provide the model.  They refused to change their bias, and<br />
once Americans had a choice through New Media, they baled from the<br />
turgid Leftist rags, leaving the newspapers to fail.  That offers hope, but keep it in perspective, the Left dominates elite media, both Old and New.</p>
<p>Much needs to be done.  We will return to this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2009/03/03/life-in-america-as-a-one-party-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration and the Decline of the Republican Party</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/14/immigration-and-the-decline-of-the-republican-party/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/14/immigration-and-the-decline-of-the-republican-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Decline of the West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pat Buchanan made some interesting remarks on the decline of the Republican Party due to immigration.  In an interview with Bill Steigerwald (October 9, 2008) he said: Q: Are we witnessing the end of the Republican Party’s 40-year cycle of power, as Chalmers Johnson says in The Nation? A: I’ve written that. I think what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Buchanan made some interesting remarks on the decline of the Republican Party due to immigration.  In an interview with <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/BillSteigerwald/2008/10/13/john_mccain_can_still_win?page=2" target="_blank">Bill Steigerwald</a> (October 9, 2008) he said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Q: Are we witnessing the end of the Republican Party’s 40-year cycle of power, as Chalmers Johnson says in The Nation?</p>
<p>A: I’ve written that. I think what is killing the Republican Party is the alteration of the electorate. You have to remember when we put this Nixon coalition together, probably 92 percent of the electorate was white. African-Americans were probably 7 percent, if that, because they didn’t vote in the South, and the rest was 1 percent. Now the white population is down to 66 percent and in voting terms it’s probably not much more than say 75 percent.</p>
<p>Republican (strategy) is (based on winning) the white vote. Nixon and Reagan won it by 67 and 64 percent and that simply was enough to win the election. But now you’ve got to do more than that. You’ve got to start getting some of these other minorities to put together a coalition and eventually, by the time as we move closer to the center of the century, if you got every white vote in the country, you couldn’t win on that alone. (laughs) And we can’t get them all! (laughs) Let me tell you this to make a flat statement: Foolishly, the Republican Party is condoning the importation of a brand new electorate which will doom the Republican Party.</p>
<p>Q: And that is?</p>
<p>A: This new electorate? Ninety percent of the immigrants coming in are from Third World countries and every single minority population which comes from the Third World votes Democratic &#8212; anywhere from 60 percent to 95 percent. These folks are predominately poor &#8212; and they believe in government. And the reason they believe in government is the best of reasons for them; they get more out of it than they pay in. The bottom 30 percent in income in the United States doesn’t pay any income taxes at all, I don’t think. When Barack Obama says we’re going to hit the top 5 percent (of income earners), the top 5 percent pay 60 percent of all income taxes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Buchanan is right that immigration has had a profound impact on both parties.  The Nixon and Reagan coalitions are in decline.  That is bad news for the Republican Party.  The opposite is true for the Democrats.  Immigration, legal and illegal, has been their not-so-secret weapon.  Immigration, especially from poor countries helps the Democrats in the way Buchanan identifies, but also ensures a permanent welfare state.  So, the Democratic coalition is growing in strength.</p>
<p>The Republicans are in decline because their core constituency is.</p>
<p>John McCain has many strengths, but he is a Democrat in all but name on the immigration issue.  The Republican Party needs to look elsewhere for a leader to reverse their decline.  More on this important topic later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/14/immigration-and-the-decline-of-the-republican-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Relationship between the Terrorist Bill Ayers and Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/07/the-relationship-between-the-terrorist-bill-ayers-and-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/07/the-relationship-between-the-terrorist-bill-ayers-and-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 U.S. Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sol Stern of City Journal has a wonderful new article (&#8220;The Bomber as School Reformer&#8221;) documenting the relationship between Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers and the Democratic Party&#8217;s nominee for President Barack Obama.  Make time to read it.  Available here.  The more you read the worse it gets.  No wonder Obama &#38; Co., and his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sol Stern of <em>City Journal</em> has a wonderful new article (&#8220;The Bomber as School Reformer&#8221;) documenting the relationship between Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers and the Democratic Party&#8217;s nominee for President Barack Obama.  Make time to read it.  Available <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2008/eon1006ss.html" target="_blank">here</a>.  The more you read the worse it gets.  No wonder Obama &amp; Co., and his Old Media camp followers are trying to bury this story.  What is most interesting is how Ayers, and many of the sixties communists, moved into the educational system.  There they seized the educational system and used it as a key tool to advance their communist agenda while destroying America&#8217;s principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/10/07/the-relationship-between-the-terrorist-bill-ayers-and-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More On Making Democrats Red Again</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/09/more-on-making-democrats-red-again/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/09/more-on-making-democrats-red-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 U.S. Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Defense Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great comment from reader PatrickHenry. I want to reprint it: Comment from PatrickHenry Time September 8, 2008 at 5:44 pm Good observations. The following article might be of interest to readers: http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/1430/ Not only does it confirm the fact that Republicans have been designated the blue party on several occasions, but it highlights the history [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment from reader PatrickHenry.  I want to reprint it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Comment from PatrickHenry<br />
Time September 8, 2008 at 5:44 pm</p>
<p>Good observations. The following article might be of interest to readers:<br />
<a href="http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/1430/"></p>
<p>http://www.visualthesaurus.com/cm/wordroutes/1430/</a></p>
<p>Not only does it confirm the fact that Republicans have been designated the blue party on several occasions, but it highlights the history of the color coded system and the formula the media uses to assign colors in an election (developed because both parties wanted the blue designation – further proof that red is associated with socialism). Conveniently, the formula has been abandoned this year, see below:</p>
<p>“This year it looks like the networks and other news outlets have abandoned the old color-switching formula, since the system would assign blue to incumbent Republicans and red to the Democrats. (See, for instance, the online electoral maps from ABC, CNN, the New York Times, which all use the blue-for-Dem, red-for-GOP coding.)”</p></blockquote>
<p>With the 2008 election, it is the Republicans turn to be blue but the Democrats obviously do not want to give up the color and become red again.  I encourage all readers to go to the link provided by PatrickHenry to learn the background of color associations for the Democrats and Republicans.</p>
<p>Three points:<br />
1) We should ponder why the Democrats so afraid of the color red.<br />
2) Americans should consider why the media are not making the change in color affiliation for This is more evidence that the Old Media are branches of the Democratic Party.<br />
3) It is time for Republicans to stop referring to themselves as red or as living in red States, and to correct friends and colleagues if they do so.  We need to correct the media as well.  Time to reclaim the blue.  We need to start now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/09/more-on-making-democrats-red-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Democrats Red Again</title>
		<link>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/06/making-democrats-red-again/</link>
		<comments>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/06/making-democrats-red-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BenjaminFranklin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2008 U.S. Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. 2008 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wherelibertydwells.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historically, Republicans were represented by the color blue and Democrats by the color red. So how did Democrats become blue and Republicans red? Consider these examples of electoral maps from 1980, 1984, 1988, and 1992. But something curious happened in 1996, the colors representing America’s two major political parties changed. Republicans became red and Democrats [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically, Republicans were represented by the color blue and Democrats by the color red.  So how did Democrats become blue and Republicans red?</p>
<p>Consider these examples of electoral maps from 1980,</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1980.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-177" title="1980" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1980-300x190.gif" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>1984,</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1984.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-178" title="1984" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1984-300x190.gif" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>1988,</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1988.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-179" title="1988" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1988-300x190.gif" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>and 1992.</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1992.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-180" title="1992" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1992-300x190.gif" alt="" width="300" height="190" /></a></p>
<p>But something curious happened in 1996, the colors representing America’s two major political parties changed.  Republicans became red and Democrats blue.</p>
<p>Political parties have images to represent themselves, the donkey for the Democrats and the elephant for the Republicans.  Colors too are associated with political parties.  Red is the color of the political Left.  For example, the Labour Party in Great Britain is represented by a red rose.  The Right is captured by blue, as in the Christian Social Union in Germany or the Conservatives in Great Britain.</p>
<p>Why did the Democrats suddenly start identifying themselves as blue?  Look at the electoral maps from 1996,</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1996.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-181" title="1996" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/1996-300x223.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></a></p>
<p>2000,</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2000.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-182" title="2000" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2000-300x223.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></a></p>
<p>and 2004.</p>
<p><a href="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2004.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-183" title="2004" src="http://wherelibertydwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/2004-300x223.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="223" /></a></p>
<p>This seemed to have just happened.  Do you remember any explanation provided?  I don’t.</p>
<p>A similar change happened at about the same time to an important American icon.  The Capitol Christmas Tree became suddenly about the same time the Capitol Holiday Tree until Speaker Hastert made the change back to the Capitol Christmas Tree in 2005.</p>
<p>Could it be the Democrats are sensitive to the color red, with its long association with socialism?  Many Democrats in the Clinton White House were socialists.  They were veterans of the 1960s where they would proudly associate with socialist red.  But having come of age, they would be sensitive to any association with socialism.</p>
<p>So, once in power, the Clintons and their allies would decree:  no red for Democrats.</p>
<p>They fear would be images of Bill Clinton, or Hillary, or Barack, or Howard Dean against a red background.  An association with the color red might get people thinking and questioning the origins and direction of the Democrats’ policies.</p>
<p>Of course, not that the Democrats fundamental policies changed:  the march to socialism would be gradual, not the direct assault on the state they envisioned in their youth in the 1960s and 1970s.  Old socialist wine in new Democratic bottles.</p>
<p>A related question is easier to answer, why did media suddenly make the change?  Most of the Old Media are in the Democrat’s pocket, and so if requested, they would make such a change, without fanfare or explanation.</p>
<p>The Democrats and their media allies made Republicans red.  And, as is so often the case, the Republicans did not notice and went along with it.</p>
<p>It is time for Republicans to fight back.  Let’s publicize these electoral maps.  Let’s reclaim the blue.  Let’s make Democrats red again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wherelibertydwells.com/2008/09/06/making-democrats-red-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

